Our Universities: Everyone Must Have a B.A. or B.S.?

We have begun to hold a readily visible evidence of education, the degree or certification, as valuable in and of itself. But these are emblems too often having little to do with knowing something or having the ability to do anything.

No man who worships education has got the best out of education… Without a gentle contempt for education no man’s education is complete.

– Gilbert K. Chesterton

_________________________________________________________

On Tuesday, February 12, 2013, President Barack Obama presented his State of the Union address. In it he proposed a concept called the “college scorecard.” It’s a nice idea and it addresses issues of value as people make choices about college attendance. The five topics on the college scorecard include: cost, graduation rate, loan default rates, borrowing rates, and postgraduate employment for college goers. Who could argue the importance of considering any of these issues individually or collectively?

However, the White House website that supports the college scorecard reveals issues that give me pause, as it touts a number of specious concepts about college that drive the cost up and the value down.

At the top of the list, “Earning a post-secondary degree or credential is no longer just a pathway to opportunity for a talented few; rather, it is a prerequisite for the growing jobs of the new economy.” Young people and families get the idea that a degree is necessary for a good job and a happy life. It is not true for all. And the fear of being left behind coerces otherwise thoughtful people into poor decisions.

When students are driven to “easy” degrees that far too many universities, public, private and for profit dispense like jelly beans, in a misbegotten form of profiteering, a charade is at work for non-existent jobs and insidious debt.

President Obama offered the political goal, “…that by 2020, America would once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.” A noble target, moving the U.S. back to number one in the world from our current standing of 16; however, if the degrees themselves are valued as tokens or emblems, they may represent and advance neither learning nor earning for the holder.

But this goal comes with a price tag. The White House website points out that, “In 2010, graduates who took out loans left college owing an average of more than $26,000. Student loan debt has now surpassed credit card debt for the first time ever.” Who is left holding the bag? Students, families and all taxpayers.

And construction on the house of cards continues. President Obama wants to double the investment in Pell Grants. This could be a good idea if the grants were only allocated to demonstrably capable students pursuing degrees in areas where national need and employability exist. Tax dollars supporting the mirage of personal growth, absent any cost/value understanding or truthfulness, is not good public policy, although it sounds good on the stump. But, how many people with low value degrees are needed to support the “new economy?”

According to a recent Georgetown University study, students graduating from architecture school post the highest unemployment rate in the nation at 13.9%, behind disciplines such as fine arts, philosophy and religious studies, anthropology, and history, to identify just a few. As an architect this grieves me as I earnestly explain the current employment projections to prospective students and families. By the time a new freshman graduates, those projections will likely be different and I tell them that too. If they are genuinely good at what they do, they will always find work. They can fight the odds if they want to, but should do so armed with legitimate hesitation, not abject fear.

Universities in concert with state and national government could make constructive suggestions about how to address the demands of “growing jobs for the new economy.” BTW, I wish somebody would explain to me what the new economy is. I still own stock in the old economy. A person with intellectual insight, skill, and creativity, whether ritualized in formal education, scavenged off the internet, or accumulated through “hard knocks” will have value in the marketplace. Whatever happened to capability as the measure of worth?

To ameliorate the damage of the egalitarian idea that utopia will be reached when everyone has a formal education, the idea itself, fueled by the fear of poverty and/or ignorance, must be put aside.

A few decades ago, presumably well-intended legislators devastated the economy by steering our nation towards pervasive home ownership with undeserved loans for unaffordable houses. A different kind of utopia but utopia nonetheless. Together these desires have driven our nation and citizenry into a mountain of debt, and achieved little in alleviating the burden of ignorance, or inability to innovate and produce, to our economy.

Our universities need to do better. We need to put the student’s needs and aspirations first and tell them the truth about the value of a degree in a chosen field: then the student, institution, and nation will prosper. We expect rhetoric from the elected classes, but our universities should be transparent.

 

4 thoughts on “Our Universities: Everyone Must Have a B.A. or B.S.?

  1. Thanks for writing this. Obama’s ideas have caused a lot of conversation in my circle of friends. I think everyone should have the opportunity to go to college, but I don’t think everyone has the ability to do so. There are far too many people who hold BS degrees who are unemployed or underemployed (that’s judging from my own network of friends and colleagues) and until we can fix that, it doesn’t matter if we’re in a new or old economy. I’m with you, not sure what the “new” economy is, but I hope it’s better than the one in which we currently live!

  2. This is nothing more than an echo of Tony Blair’s mantra “Education! Education! Education!” that was a sleazy attempt to doctor the unemployment figures and attract students, most of whom did not have the background to benefit from higher education. Then, of course, we have the raising of tuition in the UK resulting in the average loan cost being in the region of $190,000 to be paid back. As you say, utopia will not be reached with the idea that everybody should have a degree, as the numbers of Ph.D’s stacking shelves in UK supermarkets show or being refused a jobseeker’s allowance for refusing to work as lapdancers at dubious places of employment. We need a much more diversified form of education in which people who want to be plumbers (a much needed occupation) or other forms of employment receive equal respect and recognition as those who enter higher education. As you note, we are headed for disaster especially with a President who recognizes kindergarten only as a place for young consumers with sponges to be filled with market-releated skills and not exposed to the creativity and joys of real education.

  3. And ND, I think you see how the language is being used to hide things. Politicians use the term “new economy” because they haven’t a clue as to how to describe what it is…because it doesn’t really exist yet apparently. Or is it that the “new economy” is one where you have high unemployment coupled with increasing real inflation (numbers that include energy, education, healthcare that are left out now in the CPI) and massive deficits. That’s not an economy, that’s a sign of disaster happening in real time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *