Our University: High Achieving Students

Fifth in a series of who our students are and how they perform.

The role of every professor, in every classroom, guiding every student, is to challenge that student to a level at which he or she has never before been challenged.  If a university does nothing else, this alone will mark it as successful.

Man’s mind stretched by a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions.
— Oliver Wendell Holmes

High-achieving students are infrequently thought of as an underserved group; but, from a number of perspectives, they are.  Performance standards for all students migrate to the threshold level of expectation.  As test scores and high school preparation slide, the preparedness of students for university study and general student ability impact the level of quality for which universities aim. Race and ethnicity, geographic location of origin and income level are all correlated with the likelihood of success at the university even for high-performing students.  But one factor we can control is the level of expectation we have of our students. 

For example, only 9% of the students at the most selective research universities are from the bottom half of the income ladder, while 74% of the high-performing students were from the highest quartile of the income spectrum, according to Carnevale and Rose in a study supported through The Century Foundation in 2003.

Universities may unknowingly treat rural high-performing students differently than urban high-performing students. Or, rural students may have different expectations of themselves.  A 2010 study by Holsapple and Posselt revealed that high-performing students from rural areas are less likely to complete bachelor’s degrees by their 30th birthday.  Something causes this difference.

Geographic stratification has an impact on access to the best schools almost as powerful as race and ethnicity.  With rural students, expectations from the universities are often lowered, but, more importantly, the students’ expectations of themselves also suffer, driven by a lack of exposure to diverse career fields or role models.

One telling factor in the Holsapple and Posselt study that may not come as a surprise is that these high-performing high school students tended to study at senior institutions that were closer to home. This fact though suggests a course of action. The way for institutions to seek out and attract rural students who may be high achievers is clear: create a campus environment that is cognizant of their roots, and help them expand their views, not only of the world, but of themselves. 

Geographic stratification is just one manifestation of other, more generalized issues that can keep high-potential students from being well served by universities.  According to an Educational Testing Service study in 2010, high-achieving low-income high school students enroll in four-year institutions at half the rate of similarly gifted high-income students.

Students respond to the environment in which they find themselves. In The Shape of the River, by Bowen and Bok, it was reported that 86% of the students who attended the most selective public universities graduated in six years, while 51% of the students who attended less selective public institutions managed to do so. 

The unfortunate response of some institutions is to lower standards in an effort to respond to the lower rates of degree completion, when in fact the data suggests doing just the opposite.  Higher expectations get better results.

For some this is counter intuitive, but for those who understand the nature of the university environment, it makes perfect sense.  Students, like athletes, often play up to the level of competition.  In an environment of low challenge, lower effort is the norm.  This hurts all students, but completely countermands the opportunities that state-supported public universities owe to high potential students.

All students must be challenged, but especially those with a history of high scholastic achievement in their high school studies.  By challenging these students, the performance of the general population of the university will be improved, not lowered. 

Our university can only be credited with the performance that we require or inspire.

3 thoughts on “Our University: High Achieving Students

  1. You said, “… high-achieving low-income high school students enroll in four-year institutions at half the rate of similarly gifted high-income students.”

    Hmmm… Do you suppose the the fact that they might not be able to afford all four years has any thing to do with it? For decades America has had free K-12 education; do you suppose it is time to move in the direction of free K-16 education for those willing and able to master university work?

  2. You said, “Students, like athletes, often play up to the level of competition. In an environment of low challenge, lower effort is the norm.”

    My experience has been that most high performing students will thunder off like a herd of race horses if you just point them in the direction of the skills they should master, and there are always a bunch dragging around the bottom attempting to get a degree without putting forth the effort to master the skills. The ones that get hurt most are those in the middle who can and will master the skills if it is required of them and who will then go off to have distinguished and satisfying careers.

  3. It goes beyond the pale that anyone, most assuredly an educated, disguished person as yourself, would quote an individual such as Barrack Obama in any sense. Do you honestly believe that every student should complete at least one year of higher education, whether it be college or trade school? Only an idiot would spout such nonsense! There are always, without exception, approxiately 20% of the bottom feeders that cannot even get through the 8th grade successfully! Why would we want them to go on to college or trade school? It would be a waste of available and valuable assets and time. Our educational system is plagued with these type of non-performers that drag down the achievers! It is time to stop teaching to the lowest common denominator and start demanding a level of achievement that will bring the US back to prominence!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *